With morality, something new begins. The will is now with itself. But it is not yet one with what is right in itself. It stands over against it.

What does that mean?

The moral will keeps saying: I ought to. I ought to be just. I ought to help. For it, what is right is a demand, not yet a fact. A gap yawns between what it is and what it ought to be.

You can picture this as a kind of restlessness. The moral will never arrives. It always works on itself. Only at a later stage, in ethical life, does it come to rest.

Moral does not mean good here:

When we speak of morality here, this does not yet mean “good” as opposed to “evil”. It means a standpoint. On it, a person asks about his inner life, his reasons and intentions. On this standpoint, he can act well. But he can also act in an evil way. Both require that he has an inner life.

Summary: The moral will still stands over against what is right. That is why it is the standpoint of the ought. Only here do good and evil become possible.