<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 16	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/16/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Simple)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/16/#comment-3456</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Simple)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4342#comment-3456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[§ 16: Choosing something else again and again

What I have chosen, I can also give up again. After all, I can look away from everything. We already know that.

So I choose something new. And then something else again. And so on, without end.

Is this not the highest freedom? No. Think of someone who keeps switching channels while watching TV. He is not freer than someone who watches a film to the end. He just never sees anything whole.

Every new content is again something finite. It does not match the form of the will. And the opposite does not help either. Some people do not commit and stay undecided. They only stand on the other side, which is just as one-sided. So the will does not get out of finitude. It runs in place.

Summary: Endless switching is not freedom. The will swings back and forth between committing and giving up again. And in doing so, it stays finite.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>§ 16: Choosing something else again and again</p>
<p>What I have chosen, I can also give up again. After all, I can look away from everything. We already know that.</p>
<p>So I choose something new. And then something else again. And so on, without end.</p>
<p>Is this not the highest freedom? No. Think of someone who keeps switching channels while watching TV. He is not freer than someone who watches a film to the end. He just never sees anything whole.</p>
<p>Every new content is again something finite. It does not match the form of the will. And the opposite does not help either. Some people do not commit and stay undecided. They only stand on the other side, which is just as one-sided. So the will does not get out of finitude. It runs in place.</p>
<p>Summary: Endless switching is not freedom. The will swings back and forth between committing and giving up again. And in doing so, it stays finite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
