<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 217	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/217/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/217/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:56:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Simple)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/217/#comment-3657</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Simple)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=900214#comment-3657</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[§ 217: Forms and documents

In civil society, everyone also recognizes my property in public. It is no longer enough that I have something. The others must recognize it as mine.

How does this happen?

Through fixed forms. People set boundary stones. They enter plots of land in a land register. They make contracts before a notary. Most property now rests on such contracts.

Do we really need this?

Some people get angry about such formalities. They think these only help the state to make money. Or they see a sign of mistrust in them: In the old days, a man’s word was enough.

But the form has a purpose. Through it, my right becomes firm and safe. It no longer depends on the mood or the memory of one person.

A look back:

At the start of the history of right, the forms were long-winded. People often took the ceremony for the thing itself. Many such old formulas remained in Roman law.

Summary: In society, property needs fixed forms like contracts and registers. They are not a sign of mistrust. They make right safe, and they make others recognize it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>§ 217: Forms and documents</p>
<p>In civil society, everyone also recognizes my property in public. It is no longer enough that I have something. The others must recognize it as mine.</p>
<p>How does this happen?</p>
<p>Through fixed forms. People set boundary stones. They enter plots of land in a land register. They make contracts before a notary. Most property now rests on such contracts.</p>
<p>Do we really need this?</p>
<p>Some people get angry about such formalities. They think these only help the state to make money. Or they see a sign of mistrust in them: In the old days, a man’s word was enough.</p>
<p>But the form has a purpose. Through it, my right becomes firm and safe. It no longer depends on the mood or the memory of one person.</p>
<p>A look back:</p>
<p>At the start of the history of right, the forms were long-winded. People often took the ceremony for the thing itself. Many such old formulas remained in Roman law.</p>
<p>Summary: In society, property needs fixed forms like contracts and registers. They are not a sign of mistrust. They make right safe, and they make others recognize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eduard Gans (Additions)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/217/#comment-2200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduard Gans (Additions)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1833 14:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=900214#comment-2200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The law is right posited as what it was in itself. I possess something, have a property that I have taken as ownerless: this must now still be recognized and posited as mine. In society, therefore, &lt;em&gt;formalities&lt;/em&gt; occur in relation to property: boundary stones are set up as a sign of recognition by others, mortgage registers and inventories of property are drawn up. Most property in civil society rests on contract, whose formalities are fixed and determinate. Now one may feel an aversion to such formalities and think that they exist only to bring money to the authorities; one may even regard them as something insulting and as a sign of distrust, inasmuch as the maxim that a man&#039;s word is his bond no longer holds; but the essential point of the form is that what is right in itself should also be posited as such. My will is a rational one, it is valid, and this validity is to be recognized by the other. Here, then, my subjectivity and that of the other must fall away, and the will must attain a security, firmness, and objectivity that it can obtain only through form.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law is right posited as what it was in itself. I possess something, have a property that I have taken as ownerless: this must now still be recognized and posited as mine. In society, therefore, <em>formalities</em> occur in relation to property: boundary stones are set up as a sign of recognition by others, mortgage registers and inventories of property are drawn up. Most property in civil society rests on contract, whose formalities are fixed and determinate. Now one may feel an aversion to such formalities and think that they exist only to bring money to the authorities; one may even regard them as something insulting and as a sign of distrust, inasmuch as the maxim that a man&#8217;s word is his bond no longer holds; but the essential point of the form is that what is right in itself should also be posited as such. My will is a rational one, it is valid, and this validity is to be recognized by the other. Here, then, my subjectivity and that of the other must fall away, and the will must attain a security, firmness, and objectivity that it can obtain only through form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
