<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 294	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/294/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/294/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Simple)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/294/#comment-3734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Simple)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=900291#comment-3734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[§ 294: The Civil Service

Whoever takes on an office commits himself to doing his duty. That is the core of his position.

What does he get in return?

A secure living. And independence from outside influences.

Two false extremes:

One is the knight-errant. He does what he wants, when he wants. The state cannot build on such services. The other is the mere servant, who serves only out of need, without true duty and without right.

What does the civil service demand?

The official gives up the free pursuit of his own purposes. In return he has the right to find his satisfaction in doing his duty. In this, universal and particular interest come together.

Not a contract:

An office is not an ordinary contract. The official puts his whole life into this relationship. What he does has value in itself. So whoever violates his duty commits a misdemeanor or even a crime.

Protection:

His secure living keeps him from the temptation to enrich himself at the expense of his office. And the state protects him against the anger of the people he governs.

Summary: The official commits himself wholly to his office. In return he gets a secure living and protection. His service is not a mere contract. Whoever violates his duty commits a misdemeanor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>§ 294: The Civil Service</p>
<p>Whoever takes on an office commits himself to doing his duty. That is the core of his position.</p>
<p>What does he get in return?</p>
<p>A secure living. And independence from outside influences.</p>
<p>Two false extremes:</p>
<p>One is the knight-errant. He does what he wants, when he wants. The state cannot build on such services. The other is the mere servant, who serves only out of need, without true duty and without right.</p>
<p>What does the civil service demand?</p>
<p>The official gives up the free pursuit of his own purposes. In return he has the right to find his satisfaction in doing his duty. In this, universal and particular interest come together.</p>
<p>Not a contract:</p>
<p>An office is not an ordinary contract. The official puts his whole life into this relationship. What he does has value in itself. So whoever violates his duty commits a misdemeanor or even a crime.</p>
<p>Protection:</p>
<p>His secure living keeps him from the temptation to enrich himself at the expense of his office. And the state protects him against the anger of the people he governs.</p>
<p>Summary: The official commits himself wholly to his office. In return he gets a secure living and protection. His service is not a mere contract. Whoever violates his duty commits a misdemeanor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karl Marx		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/294/#comment-1914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl Marx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 1843 10:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=900291#comment-1914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[»The service of the state,« it says in the Remark, »requires [...] the sacrifice of the independent and arbitrary satisfaction of subjective ends, and precisely thereby gives the right to find that satisfaction in dutiful performance, but only in it. Herein lies, on this side, the connection of the universal and particular interest which constitutes the concept and the inner stability of the state (§ 260).« »Through the secured satisfaction of particular need, the external necessity is removed which might induce the seeking of the means to it at the expense of official activity and duty. In the universal power of the state, those entrusted with its affairs find protection against the other subjective side, against the private passions of the governed, whose private interest etc. is offended by the assertion of the universal against it.«]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>»The service of the state,« it says in the Remark, »requires [&#8230;] the sacrifice of the independent and arbitrary satisfaction of subjective ends, and precisely thereby gives the right to find that satisfaction in dutiful performance, but only in it. Herein lies, on this side, the connection of the universal and particular interest which constitutes the concept and the inner stability of the state (§ 260).« »Through the secured satisfaction of particular need, the external necessity is removed which might induce the seeking of the means to it at the expense of official activity and duty. In the universal power of the state, those entrusted with its affairs find protection against the other subjective side, against the private passions of the governed, whose private interest etc. is offended by the assertion of the universal against it.«</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
