<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 317	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/317/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/317/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eduard Gans (Additions)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/317/#comment-2246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduard Gans (Additions)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1833 14:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=901013#comment-2246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The principle of the modern world demands that whatever each person is to acknowledge should show itself to him as something justified. Besides this, however, everyone also wants to have had his say and given his counsel. Once he has done his duty, that is, contributed his word to it, he will put up with a great many things after this satisfaction of his subjectivity. In France, freedom of speech has always seemed far less dangerous than silence, because the latter gave rise to the fear that one would keep to oneself whatever one had against a thing, whereas argumentation contains an outlet and a satisfaction on one side, through which, for the rest, the matter is able to go its course more easily.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The principle of the modern world demands that whatever each person is to acknowledge should show itself to him as something justified. Besides this, however, everyone also wants to have had his say and given his counsel. Once he has done his duty, that is, contributed his word to it, he will put up with a great many things after this satisfaction of his subjectivity. In France, freedom of speech has always seemed far less dangerous than silence, because the latter gave rise to the fear that one would keep to oneself whatever one had against a thing, whereas argumentation contains an outlet and a satisfaction on one side, through which, for the rest, the matter is able to go its course more easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
