<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 317	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/317/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/317/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Simple)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/317/#comment-3757</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Simple)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=901013#comment-3757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[§ 317: Truth and error at once

Public opinion contains the eternal principles of justice. It holds them as common sense. And it knows the true needs of the time.

But:

As soon as it expresses itself in statements, everything accidental comes in. Ignorance, distortion, false judgment. And the worse an opinion is, the more personal it is. For the rational is universal. The personal side is exactly what opinion is proud of.

Two sayings:

At one time people say: The voice of the people is the voice of God. At another time the poet Ariosto says: The ignorant crowd blames everyone. It talks most about what it understands least. Both hold true for public opinion.

May you deceive a people?

A great mind once asked this in public. The answer: A people does not let anyone deceive it about its foundation, the essence of its spirit. But it deceives itself about the way it knows this and judges by it.

Letting people talk:

Everyone wants to have a say. Once he has said his word, he puts up with a lot. In France, free speech always seemed less dangerous than silence.

Summary: Public opinion contains the principles of justice and, at the same time, endless error. A people does not deceive itself about its essence, but it does about its judgment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>§ 317: Truth and error at once</p>
<p>Public opinion contains the eternal principles of justice. It holds them as common sense. And it knows the true needs of the time.</p>
<p>But:</p>
<p>As soon as it expresses itself in statements, everything accidental comes in. Ignorance, distortion, false judgment. And the worse an opinion is, the more personal it is. For the rational is universal. The personal side is exactly what opinion is proud of.</p>
<p>Two sayings:</p>
<p>At one time people say: The voice of the people is the voice of God. At another time the poet Ariosto says: The ignorant crowd blames everyone. It talks most about what it understands least. Both hold true for public opinion.</p>
<p>May you deceive a people?</p>
<p>A great mind once asked this in public. The answer: A people does not let anyone deceive it about its foundation, the essence of its spirit. But it deceives itself about the way it knows this and judges by it.</p>
<p>Letting people talk:</p>
<p>Everyone wants to have a say. Once he has said his word, he puts up with a lot. In France, free speech always seemed less dangerous than silence.</p>
<p>Summary: Public opinion contains the principles of justice and, at the same time, endless error. A people does not deceive itself about its essence, but it does about its judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eduard Gans (Additions)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/317/#comment-2246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduard Gans (Additions)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1833 14:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=901013#comment-2246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The principle of the modern world demands that whatever each person is to acknowledge should show itself to him as something justified. Besides this, however, everyone also wants to have had his say and given his counsel. Once he has done his duty, that is, contributed his word to it, he will put up with a great many things after this satisfaction of his subjectivity. In France, freedom of speech has always seemed far less dangerous than silence, because the latter gave rise to the fear that one would keep to oneself whatever one had against a thing, whereas argumentation contains an outlet and a satisfaction on one side, through which, for the rest, the matter is able to go its course more easily.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The principle of the modern world demands that whatever each person is to acknowledge should show itself to him as something justified. Besides this, however, everyone also wants to have had his say and given his counsel. Once he has done his duty, that is, contributed his word to it, he will put up with a great many things after this satisfaction of his subjectivity. In France, freedom of speech has always seemed far less dangerous than silence, because the latter gave rise to the fear that one would keep to oneself whatever one had against a thing, whereas argumentation contains an outlet and a satisfaction on one side, through which, for the rest, the matter is able to go its course more easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
