<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 326	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/326/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/326/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Simple)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/326/#comment-3766</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Simple)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=901022#comment-3766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[§ 326: Defense and conquest

States often quarrel over single questions. The military has the main task in these quarrels.

When the state itself is in danger:

Then duty calls all citizens to its defense. The whole becomes a power and turns outward. So the war of defense turns into a war of conquest.

The standing army:

A standing army as an estate of its own is necessary. The reason is the same one that gives us estates for trade and for state service. People argue about advantages and disadvantages. Often they decide against it. For to the citizens, the costs and higher taxes weigh more than what is necessary.

Summary: In single disputes the army acts. If the state itself is under threat, all citizens must defend it. A standing army is necessary, even though it costs money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>§ 326: Defense and conquest</p>
<p>States often quarrel over single questions. The military has the main task in these quarrels.</p>
<p>When the state itself is in danger:</p>
<p>Then duty calls all citizens to its defense. The whole becomes a power and turns outward. So the war of defense turns into a war of conquest.</p>
<p>The standing army:</p>
<p>A standing army as an estate of its own is necessary. The reason is the same one that gives us estates for trade and for state service. People argue about advantages and disadvantages. Often they decide against it. For to the citizens, the costs and higher taxes weigh more than what is necessary.</p>
<p>Summary: In single disputes the army acts. If the state itself is under threat, all citizens must defend it. A standing army is necessary, even though it costs money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
