<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 65	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/65/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/65/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Simple)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/65/#comment-3505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Simple)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4721#comment-3505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[§ 65: Giving something away

A thing is only mine because I place my will into it. So I can also take this will out again.

There are two ways to do this. I can simply give up the thing. An old chair stands by the street. A note on it says: “Free to take.” Or I leave the thing to a particular person. I sell it or give it as a gift.

There is a limit:

I can only give away what is external by its nature. The next section shows what this means.

Why is giving away part of property?

You can see it like this: Whoever gives something away shows most clearly that it belonged to him. Only the owner can freely dispose of it. First I take possession. Then I use. In giving away, the two come together.

Summary: I can give up property or leave it to others. But this holds only for things that are external to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>§ 65: Giving something away</p>
<p>A thing is only mine because I place my will into it. So I can also take this will out again.</p>
<p>There are two ways to do this. I can simply give up the thing. An old chair stands by the street. A note on it says: “Free to take.” Or I leave the thing to a particular person. I sell it or give it as a gift.</p>
<p>There is a limit:</p>
<p>I can only give away what is external by its nature. The next section shows what this means.</p>
<p>Why is giving away part of property?</p>
<p>You can see it like this: Whoever gives something away shows most clearly that it belonged to him. Only the owner can freely dispose of it. First I take possession. Then I use. In giving away, the two come together.</p>
<p>Summary: I can give up property or leave it to others. But this holds only for things that are external to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eduard Gans (Additions)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/65/#comment-2014</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduard Gans (Additions)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1833 13:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4721#comment-2014</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If prescription is an alienation with a will not directly declared, then true alienation is a declaration of the will that I no longer wish to regard the thing as mine. The whole matter can also be grasped in such a way that alienation is a true taking possession. Immediate taking of possession is the first moment of property; through use, property is likewise acquired, and the third moment is then the unity of both, taking possession through alienation.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If prescription is an alienation with a will not directly declared, then true alienation is a declaration of the will that I no longer wish to regard the thing as mine. The whole matter can also be grasped in such a way that alienation is a true taking possession. Immediate taking of possession is the first moment of property; through use, property is likewise acquired, and the third moment is then the unity of both, taking possession through alienation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Encyclopedia 1830)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/65/#comment-2320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Encyclopedia 1830)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 1830 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4721#comment-2320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1830), § 492:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;§ 492.&lt;/strong&gt; The contingent side of property is that I place my will into &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; thing; in this respect my will is &lt;em&gt;arbitrary will,&lt;/em&gt; such that I can just as well place it therein or not, and can withdraw it or not. Insofar, however, as my will lies in a thing, only I myself can withdraw it, and it can pass to another only with my will, whose property it likewise becomes only with his will; - &lt;em&gt;contract.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1830), § 492:</em></p>
<p><strong>§ 492.</strong> The contingent side of property is that I place my will into <em>this</em> thing; in this respect my will is <em>arbitrary will,</em> such that I can just as well place it therein or not, and can withdraw it or not. Insofar, however, as my will lies in a thing, only I myself can withdraw it, and it can pass to another only with my will, whose property it likewise becomes only with his will; &#8211; <em>contract.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Encyclopedia 1827)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/65/#comment-2318</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Encyclopedia 1827)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 1827 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4721#comment-2318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1827), § 492:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;§ 492.&lt;/strong&gt; The subjective and contingent side of property is that I place my will into this thing; in this respect my will is arbitrary will, such that I can just as well place it therein, or not, and can withdraw it, or not. Insofar, however, as my will lies in a thing, only I myself can withdraw it, and it can pass to another only with my will, whose property it likewise becomes only with his will; – contract.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1827), § 492:</em></p>
<p><strong>§ 492.</strong> The subjective and contingent side of property is that I place my will into this thing; in this respect my will is arbitrary will, such that I can just as well place it therein, or not, and can withdraw it, or not. Insofar, however, as my will lies in a thing, only I myself can withdraw it, and it can pass to another only with my will, whose property it likewise becomes only with his will; – contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Notes)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/65/#comment-2015</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Notes)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1822 08:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4721#comment-2015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Not a consuming sublation, but rather separation in general. Interest on account of the following § determinations. In alienation, a property emerges that only &lt;em&gt;comes into being&lt;/em&gt; as such – becomes so only in the expression and in relation to the alienation. Taking possession, which is use.&lt;br /&gt;
I can take a thing into possession, make it my property, because it – according to its truth, its concept – is a thing – I and the other have done something contrary to the nature of the thing. Only insofar as I have taken possession of myself – am not a slave – can I have private right against another, and he against me. – I am not a selfless thing, but rather [my] own will, which can dispose over me before all else – that this is an absolutely, wholly necessary condition –&lt;br /&gt;
If I make myself a slave, then I do the opposite of myself – to be a free will that is none – not to be a free will is [then] my free will. Free will is only that which has itself as its content.&lt;br /&gt;
Ethical life, religion – free self-consciousness of my identity with that which is absolute in me, substance, essence – the thinking [element], intellectual – only insofar am I a thinking being – a human being – cannot make myself &lt;em&gt;into an other&lt;/em&gt; than I am –&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a consuming sublation, but rather separation in general. Interest on account of the following § determinations. In alienation, a property emerges that only <em>comes into being</em> as such – becomes so only in the expression and in relation to the alienation. Taking possession, which is use.<br />
I can take a thing into possession, make it my property, because it – according to its truth, its concept – is a thing – I and the other have done something contrary to the nature of the thing. Only insofar as I have taken possession of myself – am not a slave – can I have private right against another, and he against me. – I am not a selfless thing, but rather [my] own will, which can dispose over me before all else – that this is an absolutely, wholly necessary condition –<br />
If I make myself a slave, then I do the opposite of myself – to be a free will that is none – not to be a free will is [then] my free will. Free will is only that which has itself as its content.<br />
Ethical life, religion – free self-consciousness of my identity with that which is absolute in me, substance, essence – the thinking [element], intellectual – only insofar am I a thinking being – a human being – cannot make myself <em>into an other</em> than I am –</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Encyclopedia 1817)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/65/#comment-2316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Encyclopedia 1817)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1817 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4721#comment-2316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1817), §§ 407–408:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;§ 407.&lt;/strong&gt; 3) The subjective and contingent side of property is the thing, which is in general something external, immediate, and that I place my will into this thing. The aspect of the predicate of mine, which I have given it, is interest, and my will, in accordance with this, is arbitrary will, such that I can just as well place it therein, or not, and can withdraw it, or not; – right, in its absoluteness, is at the same time, from the side of reality, a formal one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;§ 408.&lt;/strong&gt; Insofar, however, as my will lies in a thing, only I myself can withdraw it, and it can pass to another only with my will, whose property it likewise becomes only with his will; – &lt;em&gt;contract.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1817), §§ 407–408:</em></p>
<p><strong>§ 407.</strong> 3) The subjective and contingent side of property is the thing, which is in general something external, immediate, and that I place my will into this thing. The aspect of the predicate of mine, which I have given it, is interest, and my will, in accordance with this, is arbitrary will, such that I can just as well place it therein, or not, and can withdraw it, or not; – right, in its absoluteness, is at the same time, from the side of reality, a formal one.</p>
<p><strong>§ 408.</strong> Insofar, however, as my will lies in a thing, only I myself can withdraw it, and it can pass to another only with my will, whose property it likewise becomes only with his will; – <em>contract.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
