<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 67	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/67/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/67/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:37:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Simple)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/67/#comment-3507</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Simple)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4725#comment-3507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[§ 67: Work for others, but not your whole life

I have abilities, of body and of mind. I can do carpentry, do sums or sing. May I leave these abilities to someone else?

Yes, but only within limits.

I can sell a single work, for example a table. I can hire out my working time, for example eight hours a day. That is allowed. For a limited part of my strength stands outside me. I stay myself in doing so.

Where is the limit?

It would be different if I gave away all my time and everything I ever make. Then I would give away all my activity. And with it, myself. I would become the property of someone else.

A comparison:

A slave in ancient Athens sometimes had easier and more intelligent work than a servant today. Still, he was a slave. For not one hour of his life belonged to him.

It is as with a thing. Whoever has the whole use has the thing itself. Whoever has all my powers at his disposal has me at his disposal.

Summary: I may sell single works and limited working time. I may not sell my whole life. Otherwise I myself would become goods for sale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>§ 67: Work for others, but not your whole life</p>
<p>I have abilities, of body and of mind. I can do carpentry, do sums or sing. May I leave these abilities to someone else?</p>
<p>Yes, but only within limits.</p>
<p>I can sell a single work, for example a table. I can hire out my working time, for example eight hours a day. That is allowed. For a limited part of my strength stands outside me. I stay myself in doing so.</p>
<p>Where is the limit?</p>
<p>It would be different if I gave away all my time and everything I ever make. Then I would give away all my activity. And with it, myself. I would become the property of someone else.</p>
<p>A comparison:</p>
<p>A slave in ancient Athens sometimes had easier and more intelligent work than a servant today. Still, he was a slave. For not one hour of his life belonged to him.</p>
<p>It is as with a thing. Whoever has the whole use has the thing itself. Whoever has all my powers at his disposal has me at his disposal.</p>
<p>Summary: I may sell single works and limited working time. I may not sell my whole life. Otherwise I myself would become goods for sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eduard Gans (Additions)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/67/#comment-2018</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduard Gans (Additions)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1833 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4725#comment-2018</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The distinction set forth here is that between a slave and present-day domestic servants or a day-laborer. The Athenian slave perhaps had lighter duties and more intellectual work than our servants generally have, but he was nevertheless a slave, because the entire compass of his activity had been alienated to his master.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distinction set forth here is that between a slave and present-day domestic servants or a day-laborer. The Athenian slave perhaps had lighter duties and more intellectual work than our servants generally have, but he was nevertheless a slave, because the entire compass of his activity had been alienated to his master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Notes)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/67/#comment-2019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Notes)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1822 08:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=4725#comment-2019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Relation of the absolute inner to its externality.&lt;br /&gt;
By an other, i.e., the [use] that another can make of it.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relation of the absolute inner to its externality.<br />
By an other, i.e., the [use] that another can make of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
