<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 8	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grundlinien.de/en/8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/8/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Simple)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/8/#comment-3448</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Simple)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=2053#comment-3448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[§ 8: From plan to deed (the form of the will)

Now we look more closely at how the will determines itself. First, the simplest form.

I have something in mind. For example: I want to build a table. At first, this plan is only inside me. It is inner (subjective). Outside is the world. It is simply there and does not care about my plan.

What do I do? I look for a means: wood and tools. And I become active: I saw and I plane. In this way, I translate my plan into the world. In the end, the table stands there. Now my plan is outside too, visible to everyone (objective).

Here two sides face each other: I with my purpose, and the world that I find before me. We call this the formal will.

Why does the plan want to go outside at all? Because a plan that stays in the head lacks something. But who feels a lack? Only someone who also stands above it. An animal does not suffer from missing something. In our eyes, the animal lacks something. In its own eyes, it does not. But we know: Freedom is the unity of inside and outside. That is why the purpose pushes outward. It does not become one-sided in doing so. Only then does it become real.

One more limit: This facing of I and world is only the surface of the will. This is how the will appears. From now on, something else will occupy us: a will whose content is entirely its own.

Summary: The will first has the form of a plan. I carry this plan out into the world through activity and means. But this is only its outer side.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>§ 8: From plan to deed (the form of the will)</p>
<p>Now we look more closely at how the will determines itself. First, the simplest form.</p>
<p>I have something in mind. For example: I want to build a table. At first, this plan is only inside me. It is inner (subjective). Outside is the world. It is simply there and does not care about my plan.</p>
<p>What do I do? I look for a means: wood and tools. And I become active: I saw and I plane. In this way, I translate my plan into the world. In the end, the table stands there. Now my plan is outside too, visible to everyone (objective).</p>
<p>Here two sides face each other: I with my purpose, and the world that I find before me. We call this the formal will.</p>
<p>Why does the plan want to go outside at all? Because a plan that stays in the head lacks something. But who feels a lack? Only someone who also stands above it. An animal does not suffer from missing something. In our eyes, the animal lacks something. In its own eyes, it does not. But we know: Freedom is the unity of inside and outside. That is why the purpose pushes outward. It does not become one-sided in doing so. Only then does it become real.</p>
<p>One more limit: This facing of I and world is only the surface of the will. This is how the will appears. From now on, something else will occupy us: a will whose content is entirely its own.</p>
<p>Summary: The will first has the form of a plan. I carry this plan out into the world through activity and means. But this is only its outer side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eduard Gans (Additions)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/8/#comment-1927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduard Gans (Additions)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1833 07:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=2053#comment-1927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The consideration of the determinacy of the will belongs to the understanding and is at first not speculative. The will is in general determined not only in the sense of content, but also in the sense of form. Determinacy according to form is purpose and the carrying out of the purpose: the purpose is at first only something inward to me, something &lt;em&gt;subjective&lt;/em&gt;, but it is also meant to become &lt;em&gt;objective&lt;/em&gt;, to cast off the deficiency of mere subjectivity. One may ask here: why is this a deficiency? If that which has a deficiency does not at the same time stand above its deficiency, then the deficiency is, for that thing, no deficiency at all. For us the animal is something deficient, but not for itself. The purpose, insofar as it is at first only ours, is for us a deficiency, for freedom and will are for us a unity of the subjective and the objective. The purpose is therefore to be posited objectively, and thereby it does not fall into a new one-sided determination, but arrives only at its realization.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The consideration of the determinacy of the will belongs to the understanding and is at first not speculative. The will is in general determined not only in the sense of content, but also in the sense of form. Determinacy according to form is purpose and the carrying out of the purpose: the purpose is at first only something inward to me, something <em>subjective</em>, but it is also meant to become <em>objective</em>, to cast off the deficiency of mere subjectivity. One may ask here: why is this a deficiency? If that which has a deficiency does not at the same time stand above its deficiency, then the deficiency is, for that thing, no deficiency at all. For us the animal is something deficient, but not for itself. The purpose, insofar as it is at first only ours, is for us a deficiency, for freedom and will are for us a unity of the subjective and the objective. The purpose is therefore to be posited objectively, and thereby it does not fall into a new one-sided determination, but arrives only at its realization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Encyclopedia 1830)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/8/#comment-3184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Encyclopedia 1830)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 1830 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=2053#comment-3184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1830), § 470:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;§ 470.&lt;/strong&gt; The practical spirit, as formal or immediate will, contains at first a doubled &lt;em&gt;ought&lt;/em&gt;: 1. in the opposition of the determinacy posited out of it against the &lt;em&gt;immediate&lt;/em&gt; determinate being which thereby re-enters, against its &lt;em&gt;determinate being&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;condition&lt;/em&gt;, which in consciousness develops at the same time into a relation to external objects. 2. That first self-determination, being itself immediate, is at first not raised into the universality of thinking, which therefore &lt;em&gt;in itself&lt;/em&gt; constitutes the &lt;em&gt;ought&lt;/em&gt; over against it as regards form, and can constitute it as regards content as well; - an opposition which at first is only for us.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1830), § 470:</em></p>
<p><strong>§ 470.</strong> The practical spirit, as formal or immediate will, contains at first a doubled <em>ought</em>: 1. in the opposition of the determinacy posited out of it against the <em>immediate</em> determinate being which thereby re-enters, against its <em>determinate being</em> and <em>condition</em>, which in consciousness develops at the same time into a relation to external objects. 2. That first self-determination, being itself immediate, is at first not raised into the universality of thinking, which therefore <em>in itself</em> constitutes the <em>ought</em> over against it as regards form, and can constitute it as regards content as well; &#8211; an opposition which at first is only for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Encyclopedia 1827)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/8/#comment-3183</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Encyclopedia 1827)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 1827 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=2053#comment-3183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1827), § 470:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;§ 470.&lt;/strong&gt; The practical spirit, as formal will, contains at first a doubled ought: 1) in the opposition of the determinacy posited out of it against its &lt;em&gt;immediate&lt;/em&gt; determinate being, against its determinate being and condition, which in consciousness develops at the same time into a relation to external objects. 2) That first self-determination is at first not raised into the universality of thinking, which therefore in itself constitutes the ought over against it as regards form, and can constitute it as regards content as well; - an opposition which at first is only for us.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1827), § 470:</em></p>
<p><strong>§ 470.</strong> The practical spirit, as formal will, contains at first a doubled ought: 1) in the opposition of the determinacy posited out of it against its <em>immediate</em> determinate being, against its determinate being and condition, which in consciousness develops at the same time into a relation to external objects. 2) That first self-determination is at first not raised into the universality of thinking, which therefore in itself constitutes the ought over against it as regards form, and can constitute it as regards content as well; &#8211; an opposition which at first is only for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hegel (Notes)		</title>
		<link>https://grundlinien.de/en/8/#comment-1929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegel (Notes)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 1822 08:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://grundlinien.de/?p=2053#comment-1929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[zu § 8] 1. &lt;em&gt;Will in general&lt;/em&gt;. Form of &lt;em&gt;purpose&lt;/em&gt; – superfluous for the further discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
Material – given, found object, alteration, means – form of &lt;em&gt;immediacy&lt;/em&gt; – as &lt;em&gt;immediacy&lt;/em&gt; against &lt;em&gt;the immediate – sensuous existence&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
2. &lt;em&gt;Determinacy of the will&lt;/em&gt; – determinacy, particularization at first in general – each a particular – without distinction. &lt;em&gt;Return&lt;/em&gt; is here accomplishment; – sublation of the opposition of subjectivity and externality.&lt;br /&gt;
α) The abstractly universal [moment] of the activity of the will. Activity of self-consciousness, when the opposition has this determinacy. Sensuous mode of accomplishment – In each and every act of will – accomplishments of right the same – taking possession – crime – punishment – labor, the state – in any case spirit turning to spirit, – will turning to will. Accomplishment – that the other will lets it stand as valid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The relation of consciousness adds this side&lt;/em&gt; – Here what is considered are the &lt;em&gt;determinations of the will&lt;/em&gt; – as such indeed to be realized in this way – but determinations – according to their nature and content – whether subjective or objective – Here &lt;em&gt;validity&lt;/em&gt; α) rational in and for itself, β) in its own peculiar material, medium, i.e. &lt;em&gt;in the subjective will&lt;/em&gt; – insofar as this is &lt;em&gt;opposed to&lt;/em&gt; or not yet in conformity with the rational – opposition only of the universal rational will and the subjective will. Opposition within the will itself – not of consciousness. &lt;em&gt;Both&lt;/em&gt; sides &lt;em&gt;spiritual&lt;/em&gt;. – Here objectification of the will in &lt;em&gt;itself&lt;/em&gt; – concept, thought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All determinations of the will can be called &lt;em&gt;purposes&lt;/em&gt;, determinations that are meant to hold – but there is no interest in regarding them in this way, because the &lt;em&gt;content of the purpose&lt;/em&gt;, as of one not yet carried out, – and the objective purpose, are one and the same content.&lt;br /&gt;
What is to be carried out here is the &lt;em&gt;concept of freedom&lt;/em&gt; – it [is] &lt;em&gt;the purpose&lt;/em&gt;; its execution, its &lt;em&gt;objectification&lt;/em&gt;, is its development, the positing of the &lt;em&gt;moments&lt;/em&gt; – (as determinations of freedom contained within it) – moments, which the concept – objectification here means this distinction – at one time included within the concept, at another time set apart –&lt;br /&gt;
Shape of &lt;em&gt;consciousness&lt;/em&gt; – also honor, fame, fear, hope, envy – consciousness of others regarding me – eating – how the object is determined, lack –&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[zu § 8] 1. <em>Will in general</em>. Form of <em>purpose</em> – superfluous for the further discussion.<br />
Material – given, found object, alteration, means – form of <em>immediacy</em> – as <em>immediacy</em> against <em>the immediate – sensuous existence</em>.<br />
2. <em>Determinacy of the will</em> – determinacy, particularization at first in general – each a particular – without distinction. <em>Return</em> is here accomplishment; – sublation of the opposition of subjectivity and externality.<br />
α) The abstractly universal [moment] of the activity of the will. Activity of self-consciousness, when the opposition has this determinacy. Sensuous mode of accomplishment – In each and every act of will – accomplishments of right the same – taking possession – crime – punishment – labor, the state – in any case spirit turning to spirit, – will turning to will. Accomplishment – that the other will lets it stand as valid.<br />
<em>The relation of consciousness adds this side</em> – Here what is considered are the <em>determinations of the will</em> – as such indeed to be realized in this way – but determinations – according to their nature and content – whether subjective or objective – Here <em>validity</em> α) rational in and for itself, β) in its own peculiar material, medium, i.e. <em>in the subjective will</em> – insofar as this is <em>opposed to</em> or not yet in conformity with the rational – opposition only of the universal rational will and the subjective will. Opposition within the will itself – not of consciousness. <em>Both</em> sides <em>spiritual</em>. – Here objectification of the will in <em>itself</em> – concept, thought.</p>
<p>All determinations of the will can be called <em>purposes</em>, determinations that are meant to hold – but there is no interest in regarding them in this way, because the <em>content of the purpose</em>, as of one not yet carried out, – and the objective purpose, are one and the same content.<br />
What is to be carried out here is the <em>concept of freedom</em> – it [is] <em>the purpose</em>; its execution, its <em>objectification</em>, is its development, the positing of the <em>moments</em> – (as determinations of freedom contained within it) – moments, which the concept – objectification here means this distinction – at one time included within the concept, at another time set apart –<br />
Shape of <em>consciousness</em> – also honor, fame, fear, hope, envy – consciousness of others regarding me – eating – how the object is determined, lack –</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
