What must happen against fraud? Three things.

First, the true value should be recognizable. Not just what someone thinks of a thing.

Second, right should hold good, not the whim of the individual.

Third, the arbitrary will of the fraudster should not hold good. He should not get away with his trick.

But for now, all this is only a demand. There is no power yet to enforce it.

A difference from the honest dispute:

Whoever loses an honest dispute gets no punishment. After all, he did not want anything against right. He only made a mistake. Fraud is different. Here the wrongdoer has violated right itself. That is why fraud calls for punishment.

Summary: Against fraud, value and right should hold good again. Here this is still a demand. Unlike the honest dispute, fraud deserves punishment.