{"id":900444,"date":"2024-05-30T11:40:00","date_gmt":"2024-05-30T09:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/?p=900275"},"modified":"2026-09-19T11:38:40","modified_gmt":"2026-09-19T09:38:40","slug":"278","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/278\/","title":{"rendered":"278"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These two determinations \u2014 that the particular functions and powers of the state are neither self-sufficient and fixed in themselves nor in the particular will of individuals, but have their ultimate root in the unity of the state as their simple self \u2014 constitute the <em>sovereignty of the state<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>This is sovereignty <em>internally<\/em>; it has yet another side, sovereignty <em>externally<\/em> (see below). \u2014 In the former <em>feudal monarchy<\/em>, the state was indeed sovereign externally, but internally it was not only the monarch who lacked sovereignty \u2014 the state itself was not sovereign. In part (cf. <span class=\"ed-s\" title=\"Erstdruck 1820, S.\u00a0284\" style=\"font-size:.7em;color:#a2977f;letter-spacing:.03em;white-space:nowrap;\">|284|<\/span> Remark to <a href=\"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/273\/\">\u00a7 273<\/a>), the particular functions and powers of the state and of civil society were constituted as independent corporations and communities, so that the whole was more an aggregate than an organism; in part they were the private property of individuals, so that what these individuals were to do with regard to the whole was left to their opinion and pleasure. \u2014 The <em>idealism<\/em> that constitutes sovereignty is the same determination as that whereby, in the animal organism, its so-called <em>parts<\/em> are not parts but members, organic moments, whose isolation and separate subsistence for themselves constitute disease (see <em>Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences<\/em>, \u00a7 293) <sup data-fn=\"5ebab848-6447-497b-9296-f2fa3e1a6fc0\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#5ebab848-6447-497b-9296-f2fa3e1a6fc0\" id=\"5ebab848-6447-497b-9296-f2fa3e1a6fc0-link\">1<\/a><\/sup> \u2014 the same principle that occurred in the abstract concept of the will (see the Remark to the following paragraph) as negativity relating itself to itself, and thus as universality <em>determining itself into individuality<\/em> (<a href=\"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/7\/\">\u00a7 7<\/a>), in which all particularity and determinacy is superseded \u2014 the absolute, self-determining ground; to grasp it, one must in general possess the concept of what constitutes the substance and the true subjectivity of the concept. \u2014 Because sovereignty is the ideality of every particular authorization, the misunderstanding lies close at hand \u2014 and it is indeed a very common one \u2014 of taking it for mere power and empty arbitrariness, and of equating sovereignty with despotism. But despotism denotes in general the condition of lawlessness, in which the particular will as such \u2014 whether that of a monarch or of a people (ochlocracy) \u2014 counts as law, or rather takes the place of law, whereas sovereignty, precisely in the lawful, constitutional condition, constitutes the moment of ideality of the particular spheres and functions, namely that such a sphere is not something independent, self-sufficient in its purposes and modes of activity and merely absorbed in itself, but is in these purposes and modes of activity determined by, and dependent on, <em>the purpose of the whole<\/em> (which is generally designated by the more indeterminate expression <em>the welfare of the state<\/em>). <span class=\"ed-s\" title=\"Erstdruck 1820, S.\u00a0285\" style=\"font-size:.7em;color:#a2977f;letter-spacing:.03em;white-space:nowrap;\">|285|<\/span> This ideality comes to appearance in a twofold manner. \u2014 In the <em>peaceable<\/em> condition, the particular spheres and functions proceed along the course of satisfying their particular concerns and purposes, and it is in part merely the mode of the unconscious <em>necessity<\/em> of the matter, whereby their self-seeking <em>turns into<\/em> a contribution to mutual preservation and to the preservation of the whole (see <a href=\"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/183\/\">\u00a7 183<\/a>); and in part it is <em>direct intervention<\/em> from above, whereby they are continually led back to the purpose of the whole and restricted accordingly (see governmental power, <a href=\"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/289\/\">\u00a7 289<\/a>), and are also required to render direct services for this preservation. \u2014 But in the <em>condition of necessity<\/em>, whether internal or external, it is sovereignty in whose simple concept the organism \u2014 which there subsists in its particular parts \u2014 converges, and to which is entrusted the salvation of the state through the sacrifice of these otherwise legitimate rights; and it is here that this idealism attains its distinctive actuality (see below, <a href=\"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/321\/\">\u00a7 321<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-footnotes\"><li id=\"5ebab848-6447-497b-9296-f2fa3e1a6fc0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/organic-physics-the-concept-of-life-enc-%c2%a7%c2%a7-337-376\/#n-371\" data-type=\"page\" data-id=\"903662\"><em>Encyclopaedia, 3rd ed. \u00a7 371<\/em><\/a> <a href=\"#5ebab848-6447-497b-9296-f2fa3e1a6fc0-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 1\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><\/ol>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>These two determinations \u2014 that the particular functions and powers of the state are neither self-sufficient and fixed in themselves nor in the particular will of individuals, but have their ultimate root in the unity of the state as their simple self \u2014 constitute the sovereignty of the state. This is sovereignty internally; it has [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"[{\"content\":\"<a href=\\\"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/organic-physics-the-concept-of-life-enc-%c2%a7%c2%a7-337-376\/#n-371\\\" data-type=\\\"page\\\" data-id=\\\"903662\\\"><em>Encyclopaedia, 3rd ed. \u00a7 371<\/em><\/a>\",\"id\":\"5ebab848-6447-497b-9296-f2fa3e1a6fc0\"}]"},"categories":[21,13],"tags":[35],"class_list":["post-900444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-paragraph-en","category-uncategorized","tag-concept"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/900444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=900444"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/900444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":904275,"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/900444\/revisions\/904275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=900444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=900444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/grundlinien.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=900444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}