253

In the corporation, the family has not only its firm ground, as the securing of its subsistence conditioned by qualification, a firm resource (§ 170), but both are also recognized, so that the member of a corporation has no need to demonstrate, through any further external declarations, his competence and his orderly livelihood and progress — that he is something. It is likewise recognized that he belongs to a whole that is itself a member of the universal society, and that he has interest and exertions for the less self-interested purpose of this whole; he thus has, in his estate, his honour.

|238| The institution of the corporation corresponds, through its securing of resources, to the introduction of agriculture and private property in another sphere (§ 203, Remark). — If complaints are to be raised about the luxury and extravagance of the trading classes, with which the production of the rabble (§ 244) is connected, then, alongside the other causes (for example, labour’s becoming ever more mechanical), the ethical ground, as it lies in what has been said above, is not to be overlooked. Without being a member of an authorized corporation (and it is only as authorized that something held in common is a corporation), the individual is without the honour of an estate; through his isolation, he is reduced to the self-seeking side of his trade, and his subsistence and enjoyment have nothing settled about them. He will thus seek to attain his recognition through external demonstrations of his success in his trade — demonstrations that are unbounded, because living in a manner appropriate to his estate does not take place, since the estate does not [truly] exist — for only what is held in common exists, in civil society, when it is legally constituted and recognized — and thus no more universal mode of life appropriate to him is formed either. — In the corporation, the help that poverty receives loses its contingent character, as well as its wrongfully humiliating character, and wealth, in its duty toward its association, loses the arrogance, and the envy, that it can arouse — the former in its possessor, the latter in others; rectitude thereby receives its true recognition and honour.

DE ES

Comments

One response to “253”

  1. Hegel (Simple) Avatar
    Hegel (Simple)

    § 253: The honor of an estate

    In the corporation, the family has firm ground. Its living is secure as long as it is capable.

    And more than that: Others recognize this. The member does not always have to show that he can do something and that he is doing well. People know that he is something. And they know that he belongs to a whole. He works for the common purpose. So he has his honor in his estate.

    Whoever belongs to no corporation:

    He has no honor of an estate. He stands alone. Only the selfish side of his trade remains for him. His living is uncertain.

    What does he do then?

    He seeks recognition through outer signs of his success. A bigger house, a more expensive coach, more splendid parties. These signs know no limit. For there is no estate whose measure he could follow.

    Luxury and rabble:

    People complain about luxury and waste in the trades. They also see how the rabble arises. There are many causes for this, such as work that grows ever more mechanical. But we must not overlook the ethical reason: the lack of the corporation.

    Help without humiliation:

    In the corporation, help for the poor no longer depends on chance. And it no longer humiliates. The rich man has duties toward his fellows. So wealth loses the arrogance in its owner and the envy in the others. And whoever is upright finds true recognition.

    Summary: The corporation secures the living and gives its members the honor of their estate. Whoever stands alone seeks recognition in outer show. In the corporation, help does not humiliate.

Leave a Reply