[p. 554]
2.
but for the formation of such a centre the boroughs indispensable – many dependent on the Minist[ry].
α) a more recent main maxim, that the Minist[ry] [has] no influence -, not only against the clumsy, external fraud; – but officials – against this newspapers.
β) King has to appoint the Min[isters] – even a point of honour, – only one, who then forms the Minist[ry]. This Minist. knows how to procure the Major[ity] – see below α.).
Lesser shading of the parties. In main maxim the same aristocracy; never so far as the present Reform Bill from the previous one, – but throws open door and gate [to] extremes, quite other differences, the democratic extreme.
Reduction of the King to a victory-proclamateur – électeur. Government becomes problematic, King irresponsible.
The way, already become a highway, that the assembly seizes the government entirely for itself, to compel the King to dismiss the Minist.
Louis XVI. – Jacobins – only then completely ruined; – also now in Paris headquarters transferred into the Chamber of Deputies in France. It is not that there is no government – in the Comité de salut public, – but what kind?2)
2) Hegel’s footnote. [In the margin:] In England not the guarantee – differences of laws and ordinances – illusory anyway – but openly Parl[iament] is administration
The minister is taken amiss for having said that the King has given his consent to the Reform Bill. Influence thereby improper; – Lords, Dukes may have influence, patrimonies3).
3) Hegel’s footnote. [In the margin:] Counterweight, to outweigh the disadvantage – so many untalented, ignorant, crude – This disadvantage not removed in the projected system.
No. 93 Staatszeitung [1831], Lord Wellington: “In the place of those men to whom the care for the public interest in Parliament is now entrusted, quite different ones would step, and he could not look on this without concern.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.