158

First Section. The Family

The family, as the immediate substantiality of spirit, has, as its determination, spirit’s own feeling of its unity, love, so that the disposition [involved] is to have the self-consciousness of one’s individuality within this unity, as of an essentiality that is in and for itself, in such a way as to be within it not as a person for oneself, but as a member.

DE ES

Comments

4 responses to “158”

  1. Hegel (Notes) Avatar
    Hegel (Notes)

    Form of feeling – in general
    Disposition – is inwardness.

  2. Hegel (Encyclopedia 1827) Avatar
    Hegel (Encyclopedia 1827)

    Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1827), § 518:

    § 518. Ethical spirit in its immediacy contains the natural moment of the relationship between the sexes, but raised into a spiritual determination; – the unity of love and the disposition of trust; – spirit is, as family, feeling spirit.

  3. Hegel (Encyclopedia 1830) Avatar
    Hegel (Encyclopedia 1830)

    Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline (1830), § 518:

    § 518. Ethical spirit, as in its immediacy, contains the natural moment that the individual has its substantial existence in its natural universality, the genus – the relationship between the sexes, but raised into a spiritual determination; – the unity of love and the disposition of trust; – spirit is, as family, feeling spirit.

  4. Eduard Gans (Additions) Avatar
    Eduard Gans (Additions)

    Love means, in general, the consciousness of my unity with another, such that I am not isolated for myself, but rather gain my self-consciousness only as the surrender of my being-for-self, and through knowing-myself, as the unity of myself with the other and of the other with me. But love is a feeling, that is, ethical life in the form of the natural; in the state it is this no longer: there one is conscious of unity as law, there the content must be rational, and I must know it. The first moment in love is that I do not want to be an independent person for myself, and that, were I this, I would feel myself deficient and incomplete. The second moment is that I gain myself in another person, that I count in her what she in turn attains in me. Love is therefore the most monstrous contradiction, one that the understanding cannot resolve, since there is nothing harder than this point-like character of self-consciousness, which is negated, and which I am nevertheless supposed to have as affirmative. Love is at once the producing and the resolving of the contradiction: as the resolution it is ethical unity.

Leave a Reply