174

Children have the right to be nourished and brought up out of the family’s common resources. The parents’ right to the services of the children, as services, is grounded in, and limited by, the common concern of the family in general. Likewise, the parents’ right over the arbitrary will of the children is determined by the purpose of holding them in discipline and bringing them up. The purpose of punishments is not justice as such, but is of a subjective, moral nature — the deterrence of a freedom still caught up in nature, and the elevation of the universal into their consciousness and will.

DE

Comments

2 responses to “174”

  1. Hegel (Notes) Avatar
    Hegel (Notes)

    Discipline – through authority and sensuousness – discipline – on the field of sensuous nature, of the natural will – immediate encounter along this path of dependence – parental power, on which this side is dependent – power at the same time permeated by the ethical motive – reason at the same time shines dimly through and touches in it rational independence – the soul of the child unites itself with this – power, appearance of ethical power – in the manner of power over the dependence of the child –
    Precisely this authority, this feeling of their subordination – lack of independence – need of spiritual consciousness as against their natural existence – the wish to be grown up, by which children are raised.

  2. Eduard Gans (Additions) Avatar
    Eduard Gans (Additions)

    What the human being ought to be, he does not have from instinct, but rather he must first acquire it for himself. On this is grounded the right of the child to be educated. It is the same with peoples under paternal governments: here human beings are fed out of storehouses and are not regarded as independent and of age. The services that may be demanded of children can therefore have only the purpose of education and must relate to it: they must not want to be something for their own sake, for the most unethical relation of all is the slave-relation of children. A chief moment of upbringing is discipline, whose sense is to break the child’s self-will, so that the merely sensuous and natural may be rooted out. Here one must not think that mere kindness will do; for it is precisely the immediate will that acts according to immediate whims and cravings, not according to reasons and representations. If one lays reasons before children, one leaves it up to them whether they wish to let these count, and thus makes everything a matter of their own pleasure. From the fact that the parents constitute the universal and essential [element], there follows the need for the children’s obedience. If the feeling of subordination in children, which produces the longing to grow up, is not nourished, then impertinent forwardness and precocious insolence arise.

Leave a Reply