181

Transition of the Family into Civil Society

The family disintegrates, in a natural way, and essentially through the principle of personality, into a plurality of families, which conduct themselves, in general, as self-subsistent concrete persons, and thus externally toward one another. Or: the moments bound together in the unity of the family, as the ethical Idea still in its concept, must be released by it into self-subsistent reality — the stage of difference. Expressed at first abstractly, this yields the determination of particularity, which does indeed relate itself to universality, so that this universality is its — but only still inward — ground, and is, for that reason, present in the particular only in a formal way, merely shining into it. This relationship of reflection therefore represents, at first, the loss of the ethical; or, since the ethical, as essence, is necessarily shining (Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, § 64 ff., § 81 ff.), it constitutes the world of appearance of the ethical — civil society.

The expansion of the family, as its passing over into another principle, is, in existence, in part the tranquil expansion of the family into a people, a nation, which thus has a common natural origin; in part the gathering of scattered family communities, either through dominating force, or through a voluntary union, brought about by connecting needs and by the interaction of their satisfaction.

DE

Comments

One response to “181”

  1. Eduard Gans (Additions) Avatar
    Eduard Gans (Additions)

    Here universality takes as its starting point the independence of particularity, and ethical life thus appears to be lost at this standpoint, for to consciousness it is properly the identity of the family that is the first, the divine, and that which commands duty. But now the relation arises that the particular is supposed to be what first determines me, and thus the ethical determination is suspended. But in this I am really only in error, for even as I believe I am holding fast to the particular, it is still the universal and the necessity of the connection that remains the first and essential thing: I am thus altogether at the stage of semblance, and since my particularity remains what determines me — that is, the end — I thereby serve universality, which in fact retains the ultimate power over me.

Leave a Reply