[p. 522]
|522| history. But into this link the ethical individuality has organised itself, and the determinacy of this link does not concern it, but necessity; for the ethical vitality of the people consists precisely in this, that it has a shape in which determinacy is, but not as a positive (according to our use of this word so far), but absolutely united with universality and enlivened by it. And this side is also very important, in order that it may be recognised how philosophy teaches us to honour necessity, both because it is a whole and only limited insight clings to individuality and despises it as a contingency, and also because it sublates the view of individuality and contingency by showing of it how it does not hinder life in itself, but that life, in letting it subsist as it is according to necessity, at the same time also wrests it from this, permeates and enlivens it. Just as little as the element of water, to which one part of the animal world an-organises itself, and the element of air, to which another does, are, because they are individual elements, something positive or dead, the former for the fish, the latter for the bird, just as little is this form of ethical life, in which it organises itself in this climate and in this period of a particular and of the general culture, something positive in it. As the totality of life is in the nature of the polyp just as much as in the nature of the nightingale and of the lion, so the world-spirit has in every shape its duller or more developed, but absolute self-feeling, and has enjoyed, in every people, under every whole of customs and laws, its essence and itself.
Outwardly the stage is equally justified, – which outer side belongs to necessity as such, for even in this abstraction of necessity individuality is again absolutely sublated through the Idea; this individuality of the stage of the polyp and of the nightingale and of the lion is a potency of a whole, and in this connection

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.