[p. 435]
|435| in the fact that those so-called sciences did not proceed from the science of philosophy itself and did not keep themselves in conscious connection with it; for every part of philosophy in its individuality is capable of being an independent science and of gaining a perfect inner necessity, because that through which it is true science is the absolute, – in which shape it is alone the peculiar principle which lies above the sphere of its cognition and its freedom and in relation to which it belongs to an external necessity. But from this determinacy the Idea itself remains free and is able to reflect itself so purely in this determinate science as absolute life expresses itself in every living thing, without the scientific element of such a science, or its inner rationality, raising itself out into the light of day into the pure form of the Idea, which is the essence of every science and is, in philosophy as the absolute science, this pure Idea; of that peculiar and yet free scientific development of a science geometry gives a brilliant example, envied by the other sciences. Nor, likewise, is it on the ground that all reality must be denied to the sciences which are constituted like those named above, because they are properly speaking empirical; for as every part or every side of philosophy is capable of being an independent science, so each is immediately thereby also an independent and complete image, and can, in the shape of an image, be taken up and presented by an intuition which purely and happily abstains from contamination with fixed concepts.
The perfection of science, however, requires that intuition and the image be just as much united with the logical and taken up into the purely ideal, as that the separated, though true science be relieved of its individuality and its principle be cognised in its higher

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.