[p. 516]
|516| but the one is simply tied to the other, and thereby each can immediately be derived from its opposite. But the logic of opining supposes, when one determinacy, an opposite, is posited, that the other, opposed determinacy can really be abstracted from and dispensed with, just as that logic, by virtue of the nature of its principle of contradiction, cannot comprehend at all that in such determinacies the opposite of each is wholly indifferent for the determination of intuition, and in this abstracting and negative essence the opposite is wholly equal to its opposite, still less that both together, like the freedom which is over against sensuousness, and sensuousness and coercion, are simply nothing real, but mere thought-things and entities of the imagination.
Insofar, then, as a science of right is positive by holding to opining and essenceless abstractions, its appeal to experience or to its determination of applicability to actuality or to common sense and the general mode of representation, or even its appeal to philosophy, has not the slightest sense.
If we now consider more closely the ground through which science becomes positive in the manner indicated, and weigh the ground of semblance and of opining in general, it turns out that it lies in the form, – namely in that what is ideal, an opposed, one-sided, and has reality only in absolute identity with the opposed, is isolated, posited as being for itself and pronounced as something real. It is this form by which intuition is immediately sublated and the whole, dissolved, ceases to be a whole and something real; this difference of the positive and the non-positive thus does not concern the content. It is possible through this form that not only, as in what was indicated above, a purely formal abstraction is fixed and falsely asserted as a truth

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.