[p. 480]
|480| retribution rational; for through it the crime is subdued. A determinacy + A, which the crime has posited, is supplemented by the positing of – A and so both annihilated; or viewed positively: with the determinacy + A the opposed – A is connected for the criminal and both equally posited, since the crime posited only one. Thus punishment is the restoration of freedom, and the criminal has remained free, or rather been made free, just as the punisher has acted rationally and freely. In this its determination, then, punishment is something in itself, truly infinite and something absolute, which hereby has its respect and fear in itself; it comes from freedom and remains, even as subduing, in freedom. If, on the other hand, punishment is represented as coercion, then it is posited merely as a determinacy and as something absolutely finite, carrying no rationality in itself, and falls wholly under the common concept of a determinate thing, against another, or of a commodity, for which something else, namely the crime, is to be bought; the state, as judicial power, keeps a market in determinacies which are called crimes and which are for sale to it against other determinacies, and the code of laws is the price list.
[III]
Cross-reference: Absolute ethical life. In the Groundlines, § 142 ff.; on the relation of the individual and the people § 257 f.
But as null as these abstractions and the relation of externality arising from them are, the moment of the negatively absolute or of infinity, which in this example is designated as determining the relation of crime and punishment, is a moment of the absolute itself and must be shown in absolute ethical life, and we shall grasp the versatility of the absolute form or of infinity in its necessary moments and show how they determine the shape of absolute ethical life, from which the true concept and the relation of the

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.