[p. 471]
|471| from this immediately in the following way. It is a condition of pure self-consciousness, and this pure self-consciousness, I, is the true essence and the absolute, notwithstanding which, however, it is conditioned, and its condition is that it proceed to a real consciousness, which [two forms] in this relation of being conditioned remain absolutely opposed to one another. That pure self-consciousness, the pure unity or the empty ethical law, the universal freedom of all, is opposed to real consciousness, that is, to the subject, the rational being, the individual freedom – which Fichte expresses in a more popular way as the presupposition that good faith is lost3), and upon this presupposition a system is founded through which, notwithstanding the separation of the concept and the subject of ethical life, but precisely for that reason only formally and externally – and this relation is called coercion – both are to be united. Since hereby this externality of oneness is absolutely fixed and posited as something absolutely in itself, inwardness, the rebuilding of the lost good faith, the oneness of universal and individual freedom, and ethical life are made impossible.
3) Editors: Naturrecht, T. I, S. 166 f.; SW, Bd. III, S. 139 f.
In the system of such an externality – and here we refer to the Fichtean as the most consistent presentation, which is the least formal, and instead really attempts a consistent system that would not need an ethical life and religion foreign to it – there can, as in everything that proceeds from conditioned to conditioned, either be shown no unconditioned, or, if one is posited, then it is the formal indifference, which has the conditioned differing outside itself: essence without form, might without wisdom, quantity without inner quality or infinity, rest without motion.
The supreme task in the arrangement

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.