[p. 454]
|454| of the manifold with the simple towards the concept is, in the absolute concept or in infinity, removed from its wavering, and the incomplete separation is decided. In a lower abstraction, infinity has indeed also been singled out as the absoluteness of the subject in the doctrine of happiness in general and in natural right in particular, by those systems that are called anti-socialist and posit the being of the individual as the first and highest, but not in the pure abstraction which it has received in Kantian or Fichtean idealism.
It does not belong here to present the nature of infinity and of its manifold transformations; for as it is the principle of movement and of alteration, so its essence itself is nothing other than to be the unmediated opposite of itself, or it is the negatively absolute, the abstraction of form, which, in that it is pure identity, is immediately pure non-identity or absolute opposition; in that it is pure ideality, just as immediately pure reality; in that it is the infinite, the absolutely finite; in that it is the indeterminate, absolute determinacy. The absolute transition into the opposite, which is its essence, and the vanishing of every reality in its opposite cannot be halted otherwise than by empirically fixing the one side of it, namely reality, or the subsisting of the opposed, and abstracting from the opposite, the nothingness of this subsisting. This real opposite is on one side the manifold being or finitude and, over against it, infinity as negation of multiplicity and positively as pure unity; and the absolute concept, constituted in this way, yields in this unity that which has been called pure reason. The relation of this pure unity, however, to the manifold beings standing over against it

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.