[p. 490]
|490| itself. To which the third estate must be reckoned, which in the rawness of its uncultivating labour has to do only with the earth as element and whose labour has the whole of need before it in the immediate object without intermediate terms, and is therefore itself a solid totality and indifference like an element, and accordingly maintains itself outside the difference of the understanding of the second estate, and its bodies and its spirit in the possibility of formal absolute ethical life, of bravery and of a violent death, and is therefore able to augment the first estate in mass and in elemental being. – These two estates relieve the first of the relation in which reality is fixed, partly in its resting, partly in its active reference, as possession and property and as labour, in the way in which, in a manner restricted for the time being to this, among the modern peoples the acquiring class gradually [has] ceased to render military service, and bravery has formed itself, more purified, into a particular estate, which is relieved of acquiring by the former and to which possession and property are at least something contingent. The constitution of that second estate, according to its matter, Plato determines in such a way that the royal art subdues and casts out, through death and banishment and the ultimate disgrace, those who are unable to partake of brave and disciplined custom (and of whatever else otherwise drives to virtue), but only of what pushes through its evil violent nature towards godlessness and arrogance and injustice, whereas the royal art subjugates to the servile race the natures that lie in rawness and lowliness6), and Aristotle recognises as belonging to it that which by its nature is not its own but another’s, which stands to a spirit as a body does7).
6) Editors: Politikos, Steph. 308 f.
7) Editors: Politik I, c. 4; c. 5

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.