[p. 507]
Those qualities, however, which are truly ethical, in that in them the particular or negative appears, taken up purely into indifference, may be called ethical qualities and only then virtues when they individualise themselves again in a higher energy and, yet within absolute ethical life, become as it were proper living shapes, like the virtues of an Epameinondas, Hannibal, Caesar and some others. As such energies they are shapes and hence not in themselves absolute, any more than the shapes of the other organic formations, but the stronger emergence of one side of the Idea of the whole, and the morals of the virtues or – if we wish to assign morals in general to morality and were to take for the presentation of virtue the name ethics – ethics must therefore be only a natural description of the virtues.
Now as this has relation to the subjective or negative, so the negative in general must be distinguished as the persistence of difference and as the lack of it; that first negative is what was spoken of a moment ago, but this other negative, the lack of difference, presents the totality as something enveloped and non-unfolded, in which movement and infinity are not in their reality. The living under this form of the negative is the becoming of ethical life and education, according to its determinacy, the appearing continuing sublation of the negative or subjective, for the child, as the form of the possibility of an ethical individual, is a subjective or negative, whose coming to manhood is the ceasing of this form and whose education is the discipline or subjugation of it; but the positive and the essence is that, nursed at the breast of universal ethical life, it lives in its absolute intuition at first as of an alien essence, comprehends it ever more and so passes over into the universal spirit. It is evident from this of itself that those virtues as well as absolute ethical life, no more than the

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.