[p. 467]
|467| relation to an empirical manifold, and the determinacy is opposed, as present, to an infinite multitude of empirically other ones. The unity of intuition, on the other hand, is the indifference of the determinacies which make up a whole, not a fixing of them as separated and opposed, but a gathering together and objectifying of them; and hereby, since this indifference and the differing determinacies are absolutely united, it is no separation – of the former as possibility, of the latter as actualities, or of the latter itself partly as possible, partly as actual -, but absolute presence. And in this power of intuition and presence lies the power of ethical life in general and naturally also of ethical life in particular, with which that legislating reason is in the first instance concerned and from which rather precisely that form of the concept, of formal unity and of universality, is absolutely to be kept away, for it is precisely this through which the essence of ethical life is immediately sublated, in that it makes what is ethically necessary into something contingent by letting it appear in opposition to something else; but the contingent in ethical life – and the contingent is one with the empirically necessary – is unethical. A pain that is, is raised by the power of intuition out of feeling, in which it is an accident and a contingent, into the unity and into the shape of an objective and necessary being for itself, and through this immediate unity, which does not think left and right of possibilities which the formal unity brings about, is maintained in its absolute presence, but through the objectivity of intuiting and the elevation into this unity of being-for-itself is truly separated from the subject and in the fixed intuiting of it made ideal; whereas it, compared through the unity of reflection with other determinacies or thought as a universal and not found universal, is made contingent in both ways, and thereby the subject

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.