[p. 517]
|517| and reality, but also that a true Idea and genuine principle is misjudged from the side of its limit and posited outside the potency in which it has its truth and thereby wholly loses its truth. That a principle belongs to a potency is the side of its determinacy; but in the potency itself this determinacy is just as much made indifferent and present as really permeated by the Idea and thereby a true principle; and then it is recognised, as the Idea appearing in these determinacies as its shape, only as the principle of this potency and thereby as the limit and conditionedness of the same. But it is wholly torn from its truth if it is made absolute in its conditionedness or even extended over the nature of other potencies. The absolute clear unity of ethical life is absolute and living in this, that neither a single potency nor the persistence of the potencies in general can be fixed, but that, just as it eternally extends them, it equally absolutely folds them together and sublates them and enjoys itself in undeveloped unity and clarity and, in relation to the potencies, sure of its inner life and indivisible, now does damage to the one through the other, now passes wholly into the one and annihilates the others, just as in general from this movement it equally withdraws into absolute rest, in which all are sublated. On the other hand, sickness and the beginning of death are present when a part organises itself and withdraws from the dominion of the whole, through which isolation it affects it negatively or even forces it to organise itself solely for this potency, – as when the vitality of the entrails, obedient to the whole, forms itself into animals of their own, or the liver makes itself the ruling organ and forces the whole organisation to its function. Thus it can happen in the general system of ethical life that, e.g., the principle and system of civil right, which goes to possession and property, so deepens itself in itself

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.