[p. 499]
|499| laid waste – and either suppose that it is their own efforts, hovering with reason and will above fate, which labour away in such material and which had brought about such changes, or else become heated over them as something unexpected and improper, and first call upon all the gods against such necessity and then submit to it. In both cases the ethical drive, which seeks in these finitudes an absolute infinity, gives only the farce of its faith and of its undying delusion, which – darkest where it is brightest – is already in loss and wrong where it supposes itself to rest in the arms of justice, reliability and of enjoyment itself.
Comedy separates the two zones of the ethical from one another in such a way that it lets each prevail purely for itself, so that in the one the antitheses and the finite are an essenceless shadow, in the other, however, the absolute is a delusion. The true and absolute relation, however, is that the one shines in earnest into the other, each [is] in bodily reference with the other, and that they are for one another reciprocally the serious fate; the absolute relation is therefore set forth in tragedy.
For although in the living shape or the organic totality of ethical life that which makes up its real side is in the finite and therefore, in and for itself, cannot indeed take up its bodily essence perfectly into its divinity, it nevertheless already in itself expresses its absolute Idea, though distorted. It does not indeed unite the moments of it, held apart as necessity, inwardly within itself into absolute infinity, but has this unity only as an imitated negative independence, namely as the freedom of the individual; yet this real essence is nevertheless absolutely bound to the absolute indifferent nature and shape of ethical life, and if it must intuit the latter only as something foreign, it nevertheless intuits it and is one with it in spirit.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.