[p. 524]
|524| if it has therefore preferred the misfortune and disgrace of the loss of independence to struggle and death, if it is so crudely sunk in the reality of animal life that it does not even raise itself to formal ideality, to the abstraction of a universal, and thus in the determination of the relations for the physical need cannot endure the relation of right but only that of personality, – or equally, if the reality of the universal and of right has lost all faith and all truth and it is unable to feel and enjoy the image of divinity in itself but must posit it outside itself and be content with it with a dull feeling, or with the wholly painful feeling of the wide distance and sublimity, then the feudal constitution and servitude have absolute truth, and this relation is the only possible form of ethical life and therefore the necessary and just and ethical one.
From this individuality of the whole and the determinate character of a people the whole system too, into which the absolute totality organises itself, is to be recognised; it is to be recognised how all parts of the constitution and of legislation, all determinations of the ethical relations are absolutely determined by the whole and form an edifice in which no connection and no ornament has been present for itself a priori, but each has come to be through the whole and is subordinate to it. In this sense Montesquieu founded his immortal work on the intuition of the individuality and character of peoples and, even if he did not raise himself to the most living Idea, yet absolutely did not deduce the individual institutions and laws from so-called reason, nor abstract them from experience and then raise them to something universal, but comprehended, like the higher relations of the parts belonging to the right of the state, so also the lower determinations of civil relations, down to testaments,

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.