[p. 512]
|512| itself, but the same raised into the intellectual, thought and explained, taken from its individuality and pronounced as necessity, that counts as experience. Thus, in what is pointed out in experience and as experience, what matters is not that in it which we can call actuality in relation to the separation brought into intuition by thinking. But with intuition drawn into the field of thought, opining must succumb to the truth of philosophy. That distinction, now, of what positive science believes it has taken immediately from intuition, whereby, however, it has itself determined it as by a relation and concept of it, from that which does not belong to thinking, is in every case very easy to point out, and hence the complete entitlement of philosophy to take possession of it is easy to demonstrate. Then, because such a thinking, appealing to actuality, is wont to be truly positive in its opining by being in opposition and holding determinacies fast, thus taking thought-things or things of the imagination for absolute and taking its principles from these, it is exposed to this, that in every determinacy the opposite determinacy is always proved to it and from what it assumes the very contrary is rather derived. As when increased density or specific gravity of a body is explained as an increase of the attractive force, it can just as well be explained as an increase of the repulsive force, for there can be attraction only so far as there is repulsion; the one has meaning only in relation to the other; by as much as the one were greater than the other, by so much it would not be at all, and what should therefore be regarded as an increase of the one can just as exactly be regarded as an increase of the opposite.
So, then, if in natural right generally or in the theory of punishment in particular a relation is determined

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.