[p. 440]
|440| to bring it to a positive organisation. The exposition of the latter attempt will lead immediately to the consideration of the nature and the relation of the sciences of the ethical as philosophical sciences as well as of their relation to that which is called positive science of right, which indeed keeps itself outside philosophy and, in that it renounces it of itself, believes it can withdraw from its critique, yet at the same time also claims an absolute subsistence and a true reality, a pretension which is not to be indulged.
[I]
Cross-reference: The empirical manner of treatment. On the critique of starting from the state of nature see § 194 Remark and § 258 Remark.
As for the manner of treatment of natural right which we have called the empirical, it cannot, in the first place, enter at all upon the determinacies and concepts of relation themselves, as to their matter, which it seizes upon and asserts under the name of fundamental principles, but it is precisely this separating and fixing of determinacies that must be negated. The nature of this separating brings with it that the scientific element can aim only at the form of unity and that, in an organic relation, out of the many kinds of qualities into which it can be divided, if they are not merely to be recounted – in order to attain a unity over this multitude – some determinacy must be singled out and regarded as the essence of the relation. But precisely thereby the totality of the organic is not attained, and the remainder of it, excluded from that chosen determinacy, comes under the dominion of the latter, which is raised to essence and purpose. Thus, for example, in order to cognise the relation of marriage, now the begetting of children, now the community of goods, etc., is posited, and from such a determinacy, which is made into the law as the essential, the whole organic relation is determined and contaminated; or of punishment [is]

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.