[p. 441]
|441| now the determinacy of the moral improvement of the criminal, now of the damage done, now of the representation of the punishment in others, now of the criminal’s own representation of it preceding the crime, now of the necessity that this representation be made real, the threat carried out, etc., seized upon, and such an individual item made the purpose and essence of the whole; whereupon it naturally follows that, because such a determinacy is not in necessary connection with the remaining determinacies, which are to be further hunted up and distinguished, a tormenting over it arises, in order to find the necessary relation and dominion of the one over the others, which comes to no end, and that, because the inner necessity, which is not in individuality, is lacking, each can very well vindicate its independence from the other. – Such qualities, seized upon out of the plurality of relations into which the organic is splintered by empirical or imperfectly reflected intuition, and posited in the form of the unity of the concept, are what that knowing calls the essence and the purposes and, in that their form of the concept is expressed as the absolute being of the determinacy which constitutes the content of the concept, are set up as fundamental principles, laws, duties, etc., – of which transformation of the absoluteness of the pure form, which however is the negative absoluteness or pure identity, the pure concept, infinity, into the absoluteness of the content and of the determinacy which is taken up into the form, more will be said in connection with the principle of the critical philosophy, which undertakes that transformation with reflection upon it and as absolute reason and duty, whereas in empirical knowing, of which we are speaking here, it happens unconsciously.
This formal unity, into which the determinacy is posited by thinking, is at the same time what gives the semblance of the necessity which science seeks; for the

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.