[p. 437]
|437| in them belongs not to something objective but to the intermediate thing between nothing and reality, the mixture of being and non-being, and of bringing about their confession that they are only in empirical opining, then its positive side has turned out from this aspect all the poorer and has not been able to give those sciences back to philosophy. On the other hand it has placed the absolute wholly in practical philosophy, and in this it is positive or dogmatic knowing. We must regard the critical philosophy, which also calls itself transcendental idealism, in general, but particularly in natural right, as the culminating point of that opposition which, as the circles on the surface of water spread out concentrically from the point where it is set in motion, finally lose in small movements the relation to a centre and become infinite, grew ever greater in earlier scientific endeavours out of the closedness of barbarism from weaker beginnings, until in the critical philosophy, through the absolute concept of infinity, it came to an understanding with itself and, as infinity, also sublates itself. All significance for the essence of science must therefore be denied to the earlier manners of treatment of natural right and to what would have to be regarded as different principles of it, because they are indeed in opposition and in negativity, but not in absolute negativity or in infinity, which alone is for science, but have the positive as little pure as the negative and are mixtures of both. Only the interest of a curiosity about the history of science could linger over them, both in order to compare them with the absolute Idea and to behold, in the distortion of it itself, the necessity with which the moments of the absolute form, warped by a determinacy which is principle, present themselves and, even under the dominion

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.