[p. 469]
|469| reproduces itself infinitely, allows only a relative identity, and thus is itself as infinity the opposite of itself, absolute finitude. And in that it is thus isolated, it is itself only the powerless form, abandoned by the truly annihilating might of reason, which takes the determinacies up into itself and harbours them without annihilating them, but on the contrary perpetuates them.
It is on the presented opposition, the fixing of it as a reality and its incomplete connection as a relative identity, that the more recent determination of the concept of natural right and of its relation in the whole science of the ethical depends, and we must consider what has so far been set out in general in this closer relation, how the separation, once posited as insurmountable, appears in the science of natural right in its peculiar way.
The absolute concept, which is the principle of opposition and opposition itself, presents itself, fixed as it is, in separation in such a way that, as pure unity, it is opposed to itself as plurality, so that it remains the absolute concept under the form of pure unity as well as of pure plurality, and hence in the form of plurality is not a manifoldness of differently determined concepts but, as under unity, so also under plurality is subsumed; in many determinate concepts it subsumes and is not a many but one. The absolute concept, as itself a plurality, is a multitude of subjects, and to these it is opposed, in the form of pure unity, as absolute quantity, against this its qualitative positedness. Both are therefore posited: an inner oneness of the opposed, which is the essence of both, the absolute concept, and a separatedness of the same under the form of unity, in which it is right and duty, and under the form of plurality, in which it is thinking and willing subject. That first side, according to which the essence of right and duty and the essence of the thinking and

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.