[p. 529]
|529| past, is that wherein the positive lies. And nature, although within a determinate shape it proceeds with even, yet not mechanically uniform but uniformly accelerated motion, nevertheless also enjoys a new shape which it has won; as it leaps into it, so it lingers in it. As the bomb gives a jolt at its culmination and then rests in it for a moment, or as heated metal does not soften like wax but leaps all at once into flux and lingers in it – for the appearance is the transition into the absolutely opposed, hence infinite, and this stepping forth of the opposed out of infinity or its nothing is a leap, and the existence of the shape in its newborn strength is at first for itself, before it becomes conscious of its relation to something alien -, so also the growing individuality has both the joyfulness of that leap and a duration of the enjoyment of its new form, until it gradually opens itself to the negative and in its downfall too is all at once and breaking.
If now the philosophy of ethical life teaches us to comprehend this necessity and to recognise the connection of its content, as well as the determinacy of the same, as absolutely bound up with spirit and as its living body, and sets itself against formalism, which regards what it can subsume under the concept of particularity as contingent and dead, then the philosophy of ethical life recognises at the same time that this vitality of individuality in general, whatever its shape may be, is a formal vitality; for the limitedness of what belongs to necessity, although absolutely taken up into indifference, is only a part of necessity, not absolute total necessity itself, hence always a non-correspondence of the absolute spirit and its shape. For this absolute shape, however, it cannot flee to the shapelessness of cosmopolitanism, nor to the

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.